REVERSE ENGINEERING SACRACY: AN ETHNOGRAPHY OF REPOSITIONING THE TOTALITY OF TRADITIONAL ARTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF VIRTUAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND DIGITAL COMMUNAL RESISTANCE

Suryanti Suryanti; Hartitom Hartitom

doi:10.61796/ijss.v3i2.129

Authors

Suryanti Suryanti
[email protected]
ISI Padang Panjang, Indonesia
Hartitom Hartitom ISI Padang Panjang, Indonesia

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science

Articles

June 17, 2026

Downloads

View Article

Abstract
How to Cite
Metrics
References
License

Objective: This study examines the challenges arising from the encounter between the sacred totality of traditional art and the logic of virtual infrastructure, which drives the process of sacrality reengineering. This process involves the deconstruction of the inseparable unity of ritual, art, community, and cosmology, detaching them from their sacred contexts and reassembling them within digital platform formats. Method:
Employing a literature review methodology, the study analyzes ethnographic books, national and international scholarly journal articles, and relevant research reports. Results: The findings reveal four principal insights. First, the morphology of sacredness in traditional art within the pre-digital context is constituted by elements of sacred space, sacred time, heirloom objects, and the roles of ritual performers, forming an indivisible totality. Second, the mechanism of sacrality reengineering unfolds in three stages: the disintegration of aesthetic elements from the ritual core, reformatting in accordance with platform algorithmic logic, and the repositioning of meaning into entertainment content, virtual identity, and digital tourism commodities. Third, a crossroads emerges where customary authority intersects with digital metrics, prompting negotiations of identity for traditional artists transitioning into content creators and causing cultural legitimacy dissonance. Novelty: Fourth, indigenous communities develop a spectrum of digital communal resistance, ranging from passive resistance through access restrictions and platform neglect to active-adaptive resistance via sacred digital archives, counter-narratives, and the creation of exclusive communally based digital spaces. The study’s implications underscore the necessity of formulating cultural heritage protection policies grounded in the digital sovereignty of indigenous communities.

Suryanti , S., & Hartitom , H. (2026). REVERSE ENGINEERING SACRACY: AN ETHNOGRAPHY OF REPOSITIONING THE TOTALITY OF TRADITIONAL ARTS AT THE INTERSECTION OF VIRTUAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND DIGITAL COMMUNAL RESISTANCE. Journal of Social Science, 3(2), 458–479. https://doi.org/10.61796/ijss.v3i2.129

Download Citation

[1] Mongabay Indonesia, “Masyarakat adat alami multi tekanan,” Aug. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://mongabay.co.id/2025/08/16/masyarakat-adat-alami-multi-tekanan/

[2] Republika Online, “Bedhaya Semang di era digital: Sakral atau sekadar konten?,” Mar. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://news.republika.co.id/berita/ssnlds472/

[3] A. L. Larasati, “Revealing the symbolism of Ebeg Banyumas performing arts practices in social media,” IAS Journal of Localities, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 18–32, 2025, doi: 10.62033/iasjol.v3i1.141.

[4] D. Allen-Perkins, “Sacred yet connected? How contemporary pilgrims construct digital authenticity on the Camino de Santiago,” Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 11, p. 634, 2025, doi: 10.3390/socsci14110634.

[5] N. Y. K. Lahpan, B. D. Putra, I. S. Hidayana, and A. Budiman, “Digital pilgrimage: The role of online platforms in preserving and promoting Kampung Dukuh’s religious heritage,” Mudra Jurnal Seni Budaya, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 186–202, 2025, doi: 10.31091/mudra.v40i2.3155.

[6] B. N. Kurniawan et al., “Revitalisasi tradisi Jamasan pada era modernisasi di Desa Dawuhan, Banyumas,” Padaringan: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosiologi Antropologi, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.20527/padaringan.v7i1.14350.

[7] L. S. Connaway and M. L. Radford, Research Methods in Library and Information Science, 7th ed. Libraries Unlimited, 2021.

[8] M. Zed, Metode penelitian kepustakaan, 4th ed. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2023.

[9] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D, 2nd ed. Alfabeta, 2022.

[10] J. W. Creswell and T. C. Guetterman, Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 7th ed. Pearson, 2025.

[11] S. S. Pettalongi, M. Muas, A. Arafat, and D. N. Ndaomanu, Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan campuran: Teori dan praktik. Media Penerbit Indonesia, 2025.

[12] A. C. Mukin, “Nilai sakralitas Wulu sebagai Dewi Hujan pada masyarakat suku Temu etnis Lamaholot,” Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira Kupang, 2025.

[13] D. P. Sari and H. Santosa, “Totalitas sakral dalam seni ritual: Rekonstruksi konsep kesatuan estetis-religius pada masyarakat agraris,” Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 45–64, 2023, doi: 10.24071/jft.v15i1.5432.

[14] A. Wicaksono and E. Prasetyo, “Ruang sakral dalam tradisi pertunjukan rakyat: Studi etnografi pada upacara adat di lereng gunung,” Jurnal Antropologi Budaya, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 88–106, 2022, doi: 10.7454/jab.v11i2.6789.

[15] D. Rahmawati and R. Hermawan, “Waktu sakral dalam tradisi lisan: Siklus kosmologis masyarakat adat Nusantara,” Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 78–95, 2023, doi: 10.15294/jsb.v17i2.43210.

[16] R. A. Kusuma and B. Setiawan, “Benda pusaka dalam seni pertunjukan tradisional: Agensi material dalam ritual adat di Jawa,” Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 145–163, 2022, doi: 10.7454/jai.v43i2.10234.

[17] M. N. Hidayat and F. Maulana, “Spiritualitas pelaku seni tradisi: Antara panggilan adat dan tuntutan digital,” Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 77–96, 2024, doi: 10.14421/jsr.v19i1.3456.

[18] M. A. Afriansyah, “Liminalitas musik Tamuyan: Pergeseran sakralitas dan hiburan pada suku Kutai Adat Lawas di Desa Kedang Ipil,” Universitas Mulawarman, 2025.

[19] N. Ul Hasanah, “Pergeseran makna sakralitas seni Reog Ponorogo ditengah perubahan sosial: Studi kasus pada masyarakat di Desa Sumberejo Kecamatan Balong Kabupaten Ponorogo,” UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, 2021.

[20] U. Azmi, K. I. Rosadi, and A. M. Zebua, “The Urgency of Ihsan and Thinking Systemic in Increasing Motivation and Quality of Education,” Jurnal Ilmiah Teunuleh, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 83–92, 2022, doi: 10.51612/teunuleh.v3i2.88.

[21] I. M. A. Putra and N. K. S. Dewi, “Platformisasi ritual: Analisis ekonomi politik konten seni sakral di media sosial,” Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 55–74, 2023, doi: 10.31315/jik.v21i1.8765.

[22] R. Wulandari and D. Y. Nugroho, “Disintegrasi makna dalam ritual digital: Analisis konten seni tradisional di platform berbagi video,” Jurnal Media dan Budaya, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 134–152, 2022, doi: 10.15294/jmb.v8i2.34567.

[23] S. Ramadhani and A. Sutrisno, “Algoritma dan estetika: Adaptasi visual kesenian adat dalam platform video pendek,” Jurnal Seni dan Media, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 22–41, 2024, doi: 10.26742/jsm.v5i1.23456.

[24] H. Prasetyo, D. L. Wijayanti, and A. Subekti, “Dari altar ke algoritma: Transformasi fungsi seni sakral menjadi konten wisata digital di Jawa Tengah,” Jurnal Pariwisata dan Budaya, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 201–220, 2023, doi: 10.24843/jpb.2023.v14.i03.p05.

[25] N. Ul Hasanah and Z. Ahmad, “Pergeseran makna sakralitas seni Reog Ponorogo di tengah perubahan sosial,” Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 189–208, 2021, doi: 10.14421/jsa.v15i2.2345.

[26] A. Darmantho, A. R. Nuryanto, D. K. Lestari, and N. R. B. Sijabat, Ritual, seni, dan identitas: Kajian etnografi seni Nusantara. UNNES Press, 2022.

[27] R. Firmansyah and S. Handayani, “Cultural authority in the age of algorithm: How social media metrics reshape traditional legitimacy in Indonesian indigenous communities,” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 45–62, 2023, doi: 10.22146/jsp.78910.

[28] N. K. Suryani and A. Kurniawan, “Dari pelayan spiritual ke kreator konten: Transformasi identitas seniman adat di platform digital,” Jurnal Sosiologi Kontemporer, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 103–122, 2024, doi: 10.22146/jsk.v22i1.9087.

[29] D. A. Hapsari and I. Gunawan, “Tarian sakral di layar kaca: Negosiasi makna dan komodifikasi budaya dalam unggahan media sosial,” Jurnal Kajian Budaya, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 112–130, 2022, doi: 10.24843/jkb.2022.v18.i02.p04.

[30] S. Rahayu and T. Prasetya, “Negosiasi identitas seniman tradisional di era digital: Studi kasus pada penari ritual di Bali,” Jurnal Kajian Seni, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 34–52, 2023, doi: 10.22146/jks.65432.

[31] A. R. Kusuma and D. Hermawan, “Digital sovereignty and indigenous counter-narratives: Community-based platform as resistance against algorithmic culture,” Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 33–51, 2024, doi: 10.7454/jki.v13i1.8901.

[32] B. Santoso and T. Widodo, “Proteksi sakralitas di era digital: Pembatasan akses dan pengabaian platform pada komunitas adat,” Jurnal Sosiologi Masyarakat, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 167–185, 2023, doi: 10.7454/jsm.v28i2.10987.

[33] K. Wijaya and I. Setiawan, “Arsip digital komunal sebagai strategi preservasi pengetahuan sakral di era disrupsi teknologi,” Jurnal Dokumentasi dan Informasi, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 56–74, 2022, doi: 10.14203/jdi.v43i1.8765.

[34] B. Purnomo and N. Hidayati, “Counter-narrative sebagai strategi pertahanan budaya: Studi pada komunitas seni tradisional di media sosial,” Jurnal Media dan Komunikasi, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 89–108, 2024, doi: 10.20473/jmk.v9i2.56789.

[35] Y. S. Nugraha and L. Puspitasari, “Enklave digital komunitas adat: Membangun platform berbasis kearifan lokal sebagai strategi pertahanan budaya,” Jurnal Teknologi dan Budaya, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–34, 2025, doi: 10.31289/jtb.v6i1.12345.